/
News

A Boeing whistleblower offers a theory regarding the disaster of Air India

Hundreds of people died in last week’s Air India tragedy in Ahmedabad, India. The cause of the tragedy is still unknown, and there was only one passenger who survived. A number of aviation specialists have put out suggestions, and now Ed Pierson, a former manager at Boeing who is now a whistleblower, has voiced his opinion. “Chaotic and dangerous manufacturing” at facilities may have contributed, he told NDTV.

Shortly after taking off late last week, Air India flight AI171, a Boeing 787 8 Dreamliner, crashed into a residential neighborhood. At BJ Medical College, medical students were having lunch when the plane came to a stop in a dining area.

Ed Pierson (left). Credit: Getty Images

“Air India confirms that flight AI171, from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick, was involved in an accident today after takeoff,” the airline wrote on social media after the disaster. 242 passengers and crew members were on board the Boeing 787-8 when the flight took off from Ahmedabad at 1338 hours. Of these, 169 are Indian, 53 are British, 1 is Canadian, and 7 are Portuguese immigrants.

The injured are being transported to the closest medical facilities. For additional information, we have also established a dedicated passenger hotline at 1800 5691 444. The authorities looking into this occurrence have the full cooperation of Air India.

Over 270 bodies have been found at the location. The black box and cockpit recordings have been recovered, and the investigation is still underway, with experts from the US, UK, and India leading the charge. In an effort to determine the cause, the initial focus was on engine failure along with problems with the landing gear and wing flaps.

Numerous explanations have been put up regarding the plane crash, with one expert, Dr. Sonya Brown, asserting that the plane may have stalled based on the crash film. I certainly think there has been a noticeable loss of thrust. It’s unclear what caused the lack of thrust, but Brown stated that “thrust effectively makes you go faster and aircraft lift is proportional to speed squared. If you don’t have thrust and you lose speed – and radar data suggests after the initial short climb it was losing speed – you can stall.”

He mentioned, for instance, that employees would occasionally force parts to fit together in order to cover gaps and that they worked excessive hours, which prompted safety issues. Boeing denied the allegations. Pierson claimed in an interview with NDTV that the manufacturing process, which he called “chaotic and dangerous,” might have contributed to the Air India disaster. Pierson stated, “It is possible.” “Because of the issues he pointed out, the plane had been constructed in that manner for a long time, so his and my testimony that day all led to this India accident.”

“We were building planes in a hurry. Workers felt pressured to put in extra hours. Particularly, there were problems with parts, aviation systems, functional system testing, and electrical system testing. “There were many indications of chaotic and dangerous manufacturing,” he added. In order to get them out the door, we were working quickly to assemble the planes.

Workers were under pressure to do their tasks. There were problems with certain sections. I recalled that we were having problems with the aircraft systems. Additionally, I recall being rather worried that we were taking needless chances.

“I can tell you our foundation has been monitoring [the manufacturing] closely,” said Pierson, who is currently an advocate for aircraft safety with the Foundation of aircraft Safety. other planes besides the 787s and we’ve noticed an annoying trend of problems that we don’t think are getting resolved quickly enough. In closing, the former manager of Boeing stated that it is currently hard to draw conclusions about what transpired.

We won’t have the knowledge necessary to draw a firm conclusion about what occurred to AI-171 until we process the data recorder, or the black box, which has been found and its contents are being examined. “We don’t know a lot of information,” he stated.

“The report of a passenger who said they had flown a couple hours before the crash really jumped out,” Ed Pierson said. In reference to the air conditioner and other equipment, he stated that none of them were functioning.

However, those systems should always be operational because backups are in place. That raises some concerns, then. I’m not making any firm claims, but it is something that needs to be looked at. Let’s offer the victims and their families our deepest sympathies and prayers.

Facebook Comments