Eight ‘dangerous’ phrases might bring down King Charles – Royal Family on the “brink of collapse,” according to experts

Until recently, the majority of people in the United Kingdom had never lived under a queen other than Queen Elizabeth II.

Following his mother’s death, King Charles ascended to the throne, and he will preside over what will undoubtedly be a transitional period for the British monarchy. After all, several royal homes in Europe have recently been reduced down, and rumours have circulated that Charles wishes to pare back on royal pomp and titles in his own family.

Time will tell whether or whether the British Royal Family gets modernised, and what that modernity might look like. According to rumours, Charles may face some significant challenges in the near future.

According to a new survey, members of the Royal Family are communicating with the public less and less, which could have a direct and negative impact on their importance. The monarchy may even collapse if King Charles does not receive assistance, according to the dire prophesy.

However, it does not appear to be the only big concern, as one royal expert is now stating that there are eight easy phrases that might derail King Charles’ entire reign.

The British monarchy has a thousand-year history. For the past seven decades, Queen Elizabeth II has been its proud, stoic, and iconic mother, adored by everyone who support the monarchy.

When his mother died last year, King Charles came to the British throne, but his mission may be one of the most difficult any monarch has faced in a long time.

During royal engagements, protests against the monarchy and King Charles have become widespread. It stands to reason that we shall see more at Charles’ coronation on May 6.

For many years, the advantages and cons of monarchy have been debated in numerous countries. Some say that a royal family promotes national unity, and that if they are popular, why remove them? Others argue that monarchs are outmoded institutions that cost taxpayers too much money to justify their prolonged existence.

When Queen Elizabeth died, a new discussion over the British monarchy’s importance arose. According to a 2021 YouGov poll, 41 percent of 18 to 24 year olds supported the notion of an elected head of state over a monarch.

Naturally, King Charles and the rest of the British Royal Family face a monumental task in modernising the monarchy and guaranteeing its relevance in the years ahead. The United Kingdom looks very different today than it did when Queen Elizabeth II ascended to the throne in 1952; for one thing, it is now a multi-ethnic and multi-faith country.

According to a new research, the royals are attending fewer engagements than in prior years. According to one analyst, this could lead to the “collapse” of the monarchy as we know it, but King Charles has another, more pressing issue to deal with.

According to royal scholar Daniela Elser, eight words might “bring” King Charles down. She explained in an article for news.com.au that other members of the Royal Family might pose an existential threat to the Firm’s health as well as the incoming monarch’s reign.

The “idiot relatives,” according to Elser, are a “dangerous issue” that has “been left to fester.” She feels Prince Andrew and Prince Harry, in particular, pose the greatest threat.

“As long as the eight words ‘The Duke of York’ and ‘The Duke of Sussex’ appear as Counsellors of State on the royal website, His Majesty is jeopardising his reign – and the whole palace shebang,” Elser stated.

“[Andrew and Harry] are both a seemingly never-ending source of trouble for the monarch, yet both remain woven into the royal fabric,” she added.

Camilla, the Queen Consort, William, The Prince of Wales, Harry, The Duke of Sussex, Andrew, The Duke of York, and Princess Beatrice are the current Counsellors of State.

Counsellors of State, according to Buckingham Palace, “are authorised to carry out most of the Sovereign’s official duties, such as attending Privy Council meetings, signing routine documents, and receiving the credentials of new ambassadors to the United Kingdom.” They cannot, however, choose a new Prime Minister or be allocated tasks such as Commonwealth matters.